Comment on Federal judge again strikes down California law banning gun magazines of more than 10 rounds

• random65837@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Give an example of how that’s a straw man, its literally punishing the innocent for the crimes of criminal with laws theyre already ignoring.

  Nice try.

  source

  • PizzaMan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Give an example of how that’s a straw man

    I never said anything about any of this:

    • criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal

    Or this:

    • I’ll bet speed limits and DUI laws stop people too right?

    You are arguing against a position I do not hold, and thus a strawman.

    source

    • random65837@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      If your argument is that limiting magazine capacity for people not commuting crimes, has an effect on people that ignore laws and will not produce any real life result as a consequence of that, than yes, you are.

      source

      • PizzaMan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Now you’ve moved the goal posts.

        These two statements:

        • has an effect on people that ignore laws

        and

        • criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal

        are fundamentally different claims.

        source

        • -> View More Comments