Comment on Federal judge again strikes down California law banning gun magazines of more than 10 rounds
random65837@lemmy.world 1 year agoLOL! Sure lunatic. So the criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal right? Makes no difference that its a felony for them to be in possession of a firearm is already a crime, the mag limit… That’ll stop them right?
You’re hilarious. I’ll bet speed limits and DUI laws stop people too right? The ol’ gotta do “something” even when its proven not to work mindset huh?
Plan your next vacation to reality.
PizzaMan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
random65837@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Give an example of how that’s a straw man, its literally punishing the innocent for the crimes of criminal with laws theyre already ignoring.
Nice try.
PizzaMan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I never said anything about any of this:
Or this:
You are arguing against a position I do not hold, and thus a strawman.
random65837@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If your argument is that limiting magazine capacity for people not commuting crimes, has an effect on people that ignore laws and will not produce any real life result as a consequence of that, than yes, you are.