I don’t get this argument when literally everything else is hundreds of times worse like lifestock and cars. Removing either one today would dramatically change the environment.
Do you drive a car or take any kind of transportation?
Comment on DuckDuckGo poll says 90% responders don't want AI
Mwa@thelemmy.club 3 days agosomeone tell them AI isnt good for the environment
kevin2107@lemmy.world 2 days ago
NewDay@piefed.social 3 days ago
Ecosia produces its own green solar energy. According to them, they produce twice as much as they consume. The AI is still shit, because it is just ChatGPT.
morto@piefed.social 2 days ago
Reducing the albedo of some area just to disperse the captured energy for no utility (ai) is still harmful to the environment and contributes to earth’s energy imbalance. Solar energy is great when it replaces fossil fuel emissions, not when it’s just wasted.
Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 days ago
that gives me a good idea for them: a opt-in AI powered entirely by solar energy if we solve the ethics problem first ofc