Comment on Nazis Have the Dumbest Star Trek Opinions | Jessie Gender
usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 19 hours agoNo one here is complaining about legitimate criticisms.
(But also an aggregated numeric value is not a criticism at all, it’s a reductive metric that means very little and I don’t understand why people ascribe so much value to these things).
But also an aggregated numeric value is not a criticism at all
How’s that? If 10 of your coworkers rated your job performance as 5/10; would you think that’s not a critical indicator of a failing performance?
How about viewer count, shall we go look that up?
How’s that? If 10 of your coworkers rated your job performance as 5/10; would you think that’s not a critical indicator of a failing performance?
No. I’ve never been evaluated in such a fashion, and I’d resent it if I were. I think my boss should have the competence to judge my work on its own merits. I judge the shows I watch the same way.
I’m confused as to your purpose here. You seem to be arguing that the show is bad because it’s unpopular. Is that how you form all your opinions? Popular vote, no need to think for yourself?
You seem to be arguing that the show is bad because it’s unpopular.
The premis of the thread seems to be that the show is getting review bombed because of MAGA. I pointed out that filtering out the United States still gives abysmally low scores.
If you look at viewer count (low) and review bombs (high), it seems to indicate that the producers are wildly out of touch with what the majority of the Star Trek audience is about.
I rate your comments in this thread 0/100 now please follow your own logic and cancel the entire production.
Irrelevant because I’m not the one trying to sell a product. A rating is a general but not perfect indication of audience acceptance; it should be obvious why someone should care.
If someone review bombs a product it’s because they’re a fan of a previous product, and are massively disappointed in the current offering.
If viewership is low, and review bombs are high, that’s an incredible indicator that the producers don’t understand their audience.
It could be a terrible indicator of your actual performance, if five of your coworkers rated you a ten honestly, but the other five rated you a zero because they hated the Black Lives Matter sign in your cubicle.
Yeah and if it had absolutely nothing to do with the black lives matter sign, and the person inserted the black lives matter sign as a defense, that what is it?
Then it is still meaningless if 5 rate you a 10 and 5 a 0. What would this rating say about you?
Kirk@startrek.website 12 hours ago
For the life of me, I’ll never understand the mind of a viewer who gives a shit about aggregated rating scores like that.