I didn’t watch this. Tf happened here? It looks like furry r34…this is in the original!?!
Comment on Zootopia
NannerBanner@literature.cafe 1 day agoYeah, but you can still get pretty close to the same idea with the normal, I’d say. Good on the creator for making it a bit better. Image
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 day ago
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 day ago
I mean, if you just watch the scene that’s linked there it makes it pretty clear. Nick (the fox) is pretending to stalk and kill Judy (the rabbit) by biting her neck. This specific frame is her intentionally over-acting dying after the reveal that it’s fake.
FosterMolasses@leminal.space 20 hours ago
Nick is pretending to stalk and kill Judy by biting her neck
The more we explain this the worse it sounds, lmaoooooo
NannerBanner@literature.cafe 1 day ago
Aye, it’s like the ‘sex scene’ in lion king. When in the context of the film, you wouldn’t even notice it as potentially lewd, but a single frame can appear pretty different.
ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I think those were deliberately “bedroom eyes” actually
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 day ago
looks like furry r34
Well, Zootopia inspired so much of that (and maybe vice-versa?!) that you often can’t tell.
FosterMolasses@leminal.space 20 hours ago
Lmfao, how is the original shot somehow WORSE and more suggestive? Bahahahaha
NannerBanner@literature.cafe 9 hours ago
Because selling sex is much more about the teasing than the actual presentation. I’m convinced that the reason we don’t have nude models selling you stuff on billboards is that the lingerie/just-before-the-bedroom clothes are more effective, so advertising companies don’t care to get case law or actual legislation allowing nude advertisements.