Comment

Comment on F*** You! Co-Creator of Go Language is Rightly Furious Over This Appreciation Email

You seem pretty confident in your position. Do you mind sharing where this confidence comes from?

Was there a particular paper or expert that anchored in your mind the surety that a trillion paramater transformer organizing primarily anthropomorphic data through self-attention mechanisms wouldn’t model or simulate complex agency mechanics?

I see a lot of sort of hyperbolic statements about transformer limitations here on Lemmy and am trying to better understand how the people making them are arriving at those very extreme and certain positions.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Nalivai@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
That’s the fun thing: burden of proof isn’t on me. You seem to think that if we throw enough numbers at the wall, the resulting mess will become sentient any time now. There is no indication of that. The hypothesis that you operate on seems to be that complexity inevitably leads to not just any emerged phenomenon, but also to a phenomenon that you predicted would emerge. This hypotheses was started exclusively on idea that emerged phenomena exist. We spent significant amount of time running world-wide experiment on it, and the conclusion so far, if we peel the marketing bullshit away, is that if we spend all the computation power in the world on crunching all the data in the world, the autocomplete will get marginally better in some specific cases. And also that humans are idiots and will anthropomorphize anything, but that’s a given.
It doesn’t mean this emergent leap is impossible, but mainly because you can’t really prove the negative. But we’re no closer to understanding the phenomenon of agency than we were hundred years ago.

source
- kromem@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  So… “I don’t know and don’t have any sources, it’s just a gut feeling”? That’s fine if that’s your answer, btw.
  
  Ok, second round of questions.
  
  What kinds of sources would get you to rethink your position?
  
  And is this topic a binary yes/no, or a gradient/scale?
  
  source
Best_Jeanist@discuss.online ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
Well that’s simple, they’re Christians - they think human beings are given souls by Yahweh, and that’s where their intelligence comes from. Since LLMs don’t have souls, they can’t think.

source