Of course there’s a middle ground, that’s much closer in my ideal world to StackOverflow than it is to Yahoo Answers or Quora.
Comment on Stack Overflow in freefall: 78 percent drop in number of questions
JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 days agoYou don’t think there’s any middle ground between the two? None whatsoever?
ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 days ago
Nobody here is suggesting you to use Yahoo Answers.
ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
If Stack Overflow is a 3/10 then Quora is a 1/10 and Yahoo Answers is -5/10.
elephantium@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Well, no. If there were a middle ground, we’d all be using it.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 days ago
Like Lemmy? The site we’re all using?
But no my point wasn’t about a specific site, it’s about the moderation approach. Do you really think there’s no middle ground in approach to moderation between Yahoo Answers and StackOverflow?
elephantium@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Cute. Except Lemmy hasn’t helped me solve any programming problems. StackOverflow has.
And I think you missed my point, so I’ll restate it: If this theoretical middle-ground moderation were actually viable, it would have eaten StackOverflow’s lunch like a decade ago. People were SALTY about SO’s hostility even before the “summer of love” campaign in 2012.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 day ago
It’s viable, StackExchange as a company is just shit. See: then never listening to meta, listening to random Twitter users more, and defaming their volunteer moderators.
ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Lemmy isn’t a Q&A application in the way that the others I mentioned are.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 days ago
Like I said, I’m not talking about specific sites, I’m talking about moderation style.