It was 3.2GB and afaik it wasn’t a bug, but 800MB was reserved for hardware IO
Wasn’t there a bug that made XP unable to hit even 4GB, I seem to recall a limit of 3,5GB ram…
Decq@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Wasn’t there a bug that made XP unable to hit even 4GB, I seem to recall a limit of 3,5GB ram…
It was 3.2GB and afaik it wasn’t a bug, but 800MB was reserved for hardware IO
frongt@lemmy.zip 6 days ago
Short answer, no, there were artificial limitations to ensure compatibility. Plenty of long-form answers if you care to search.