You can skew the results if you’re accounting for bad aim.
Comment on I've never been in a situation where me having a gun would have made things bettter.
rekabis@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
I have always been of the opinion that if you cannot solve a violent/dangerous situation with six or less bullets, it is vanishingly unlikely that anything will materially change in your favour if you had more.
kossa@feddit.org 4 days ago
brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
Ive considered conceal carry.
People would say my .38 special with 6 rounds isn’t enough. If six rounds ain’t enough to create an opening for me to run like a little bitch, shits really hit the fan and more bullets isn’t gonna solve it.
I just want to run away.
rekabis@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
My statement has two interpretations, yours is the one that most people just don’t cotton onto.
Honestly, “running away” is the best possible solution in most any conflict. And when the bullets are flying, you want your opponent to duck and cover just long enough for you to skedaddle and get out of range or into an escape route out of the fire line. Hell, in that circumstance blanks would be sufficient to get that job done.