So to phrase this appropriately: you could say the apartheid blood emerald trust fund baby is experimenting with dangerous technology on disabled people because he views them as less than human. I don’t think it can be viewed any other way than sleazy. Besides it’s not like people with disabilities are so desperate they don’t care about their quality of life.
He's testing it on paralyzed people, so they're probably depressed and desperate. It's kind of like he's trying to help, but it could be seen as sleazy because he knows these people will try anything to fix their situation.
Clevermistakes@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
DeveloperKai@lemmy.world 9 months ago
“He’s testing it on paralyzed people”
He’s exploiting paralyzed people under the guise of trying to help them.
jhulten@infosec.pub 9 months ago
Hes experimenting on the disabled.
thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 9 months ago
I mean, at some point a treatment for the disabled has to be tested on the disabled.
keefshape@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
It is at the current stage. That is the point.
Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world 9 months ago
When some stupid high percentage of animal test subjects die from the test, you would think they’d work on the product more before moving forward. Instead they’re like “welp caused paralysis and death in the majority of our animal test patients, this is totally ready for human tests!”
squiblet@kbin.social 9 months ago
Sure, that's what I was saying in the following sentence.