If Hitler had nukes we would have been upset to learn about that.
Sorry, you are too stupid to participate in conversation. You may leave now.
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
Yeah Mutually Assured Destruction is a helluva thing isn’t it?
Antisemitic types that want another holocaust might be butt-hurt over this, but most people understand that all nukes are bad, but Israel’s nukes aren’t somehow worse than those owned by Russia, USA, China, UK, France, North Korea, India, or Pakistan. Every one of those countries would nuke another country if they became an existential threat to them. But why are you upset over Israel having nukes and don’t worry at all about the other eight countries that have them?
Oh right, because they’re Jews.
Feel free to your rationalizations over why your feelings on this aren’t rooted in antisemitism below this comment.
AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 4 days ago
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Might be relevant in a world where it wasn’t the first comment I made and where we aren’t literally talking about a fascist dictatorship actively committing genocide.
You’re too stupid to participate in conversation, you can leave now.
michaelmrose@lemmy.world 4 days ago
The assertion true or false is that Israel would attack others not involved in its destruction if it should fall. This is like the US worrying about being invaded by the Chinese in the 60s and threatening to nuke Switzerland and Australia to keep people from staying neutral.