Comment on What is with these videos where it's just someone reaction to shit someone else is doing?

• Korhaka@sopuli.xyz ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Pretty sure pasting your face over it doesn’t count though, surely? Otherwise I have a new piracy idea

  source

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    You’re a few years behind on that discussion

    source
  • skisnow@lemmy.ca ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Otherwise I have a new piracy idea

    New in what sense? It’s literally what they’re already doing.

    The problem from a legal standpoint is that the rules on what qualifies as commentary are fuzzy enough that you have to actually go to court for a decision, which nobody likes doing. Even the copyright holders are slightly wary of it, on account of the longer-term implications if they lose and set an unfortunate precedent.

    jdsupra.com/…/reaction-videos-and-copyright-law-b…

    Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc. A YouTube show used viral clips from Jukin Media’s library while adding comedic commentary. The court found that some segments were transformative and fair use, while others were not. The decision emphasized that each clip must be analyzed individually based on its purpose and editing.

    source

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Well it seems like currently they are just pirating content from small creators that don’t have legal teams to defend themselves. If its actually ok do it with Disney.

      source

      • AA5B@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        What if it’s a political reaction by “the other side”? Where I’ve noticed it is political commentary where they’re holding someone up for ridicule, but they don’t add anything of value other than showing it to a different audience in a different context.

        source

        • -> View More Comments