Comment on GOG is getting acquired by its original co-founder: What it means for you

Solumbran@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

• Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  care to explain?

  source
• JigglySackles@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  In what way?

  source

  • Solumbran@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    They’ve been pushing a stupid launcher for tracking, have been selling non-up-to-date games, non-drm-free games, incomplete games (ex: no linux version while it is on steam), pushing weird porn games on the front page just because they sell, etc.

    It’s been getting worse and worse over the past ~5 years, and I never saw it get better.

    source

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      How much of that (the game related stuff rather than the GOG specific things) is due to publisher/developer restrictions I wonder.

      Didn’t know about most of that though. Very disappointing hearing about non-drm-free games too. That’s the main and definitely most important reason I’ve been buying things on GOG. DRM free with an offline installer.

      The only one not bothering me is the porn games. As long as I can filter things with a default filter if it gets annoying, I’m not bothered buy any type of game being sold there.

      source

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        They make a big deal out of saying that they hand-pick games and make sure they’re good and proper, then they take responsibility of quality problems of the games that are available.

        And last I checked you cannot filter. If you do a search, sure, but not on the main page, and during times like around Valentine’s day, the website starts looking like a weird porn website. Also, they claim that they select good games, and no one is going to make me believe that those porn games are good quality games.

        source

        • -> View More Comments