Comment on w e a k n e s s
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 month ago
This post more than others needs accessibility: low contrast, difficult to read even without impairment.
Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative: - usability - we can’t quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR - text search is unavailable - the system can’t - reflow text to varied screen sizes - vary presentation (size, contrast) - vary modality (audio, braille) - accessibility - lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc) - some users can’t read the image due to lack of alt text - users can’t adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments - systems can’t read the text to them or send it to braille devices - searchability: the “text” isn’t indexable by search engine in a meaningful way - fault tolerance: no text fallback if - image breaks - image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations. Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.
thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
What if I want to make a low-effort shitpost without spending energy worrying about whether anyone actually can, or even wants, to read it?
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 5 weeks ago
Then you’re just being ableist & denying the disabled shit.
thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Image