Comment on PieFed 1.4 is released - emoji, federated stackoverflow and AI content filters
rglullis@communick.news 2 weeks ago‘ChooseAnswer’ is not an object type defined by activitystreams, and the json-ld context provided by PieFed server has no extension referring to it.
This means that any server ingests messages to an inbox using RDF will see this document and think “this is invalid” and drop it. If it sent as:accept instead, it would work without any modification.
Skavau@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Yes, there are some people against it. But the majority of the fediverse support the idea of modular communities.
rglullis@communick.news 2 weeks ago
You can have “modular communities” while violating basic compatibility with the standards. But it is harder to do it and the end users don’t see the potential issues, they will gladly cheer you to do it in the easiest way.
Snoopy@piefed.social 1 week ago
Hi, i really, really invite you to use piefed git in Codeberg and open an issue here.
Why ? Because it will be easier for piefed dev to track your feedback and organize it for the next update.
As for the emoji functionality, iceshrimp/mastoon already use them. I’m not well versed on the technical side.
rglullis@communick.news 1 week ago
Why should I take on the burden of acting as QA and standards-compliance supervisor for a project that I have no direct interest or stake on? Especially when the attitude of the developers is “throw something out there that works, if someone complains we revise it later”?
Skavau@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Yeah, but if I recall you specifically - in the past (activitypub issues aside) - took specific issue with the concept of moving a user’s posts to another instance via hypothetical community migration.