Comment on AI-generated code contains more bugs and errors than human output

• Grimy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  The cost of the improvement doesn’t change the fact that it’s happening. I guess we could all play pretend instead if it makes you feel better about it. Don’t worry, the models are getting dumber!

  source

  • underisk@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Don’t worry bro, the models are getting dumber!

    That would be pretty impressive when they already lack any intelligence at all.

    source
  • Eranziel@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    And I ask you - if those same trillions of dollars were instead spent on materially improving the lives of average people, how much more progress would we make as a society? This is an absolutely absurd sum of money were talking about here.

    source

    • Grimy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It’s beside the point. I’m simply saying that AI will improve in the next year. The cost to do so or all the others things that money could be spent on doesn’t matter when it’s clearly going to be spent on AI. I’m not in charge of monetary policies anywhere, I have no say in the matter. I’m just pushing back on the fantasies.

      source

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I have the impression that anti-AI people don’t understand that they are giving up agency for the sake of temporary feels. If they truly cared about ethical usage of AI, they would be wanting to have mastery that is at least equal to that of corporations and the 1%.

        Making AI into a public good is key to a better future.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • architect@thelemmy.club ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      None, because none of it would go to attempting to slow climate change. It would be dumped into consumption as always instead of attempting to right this ship.

      The suffering is happening regardless.

      Yout desire to delay it only leads to more suffering.

      Y’all are mourning a what if that was never in the cards for us.

      source
  • mcv@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    They might. The amount of money they’re pumping into this is absolutely staggering. I don’t see how they’re going to make all of that money back, unless they manage to replace nearly all employees.

    Either way it’s going to be a disaster: mass unemployment or the largest companies in the world collapsing.

    source

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I dunno, the death of mega corporations would do the world a great deal of good. Healthier capitalism requires competition, and a handful of corporations of any given sector isn’t going to seriously compete nor pay good wages.

      source

      • mcv@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        It’s certainly the option I’m rooting for, but it would still be a massive drama and disrupt a lot of lives. Which is why they’ll probably get bailed out with taxpayer money.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• architect@thelemmy.club ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  It’s happening regardless. The rich and powerful will have this tech whether you like it or not. Y’all are thinking emotionally about this and not logically. You want to take away this tool from regular people for what reason?

  source