Comment

Comment on Firefox Will Ship with an "AI Kill Switch" to Completely Disable all AI Features - 9to5Linux

As much as i hate ai, and dont want it in any of my tools and programs, as a business it is a different thing.
I believe it is a bubble and it needs to burst so bad atm, but as a business you do not want to be left behind on the hype train. Its a risk you are taking if you dont that if the bubble doesnt burst ( which it might not ) your company is left in the dust and dies.

The more reasons i want it to pop, because businesses are not taking the risk (obviously) and its killing their program for me

source

Sort:hotnew top

jjjalljs@ttrpg.network ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
I don’t think there’s any evidence that AI needs to be baked into the browser. They have a robust extension ecosystem for this sort of thing.

source
- Zetta@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  Duh, there’s no evidence that it needs to happen, but it’s the hype thing to do right now for web browsers, and Firefox is already way behind. I know it may be hard to believe if you only browse Lemmy (like myself), but the average person actually likes these so-called “AI” tools or at least a significant amount of them do.
  
  So Firefox needs to try and attract more normies from chrome, a lot of these “normal” people would be more likely to switch for that 'one killer ai feature".
  
  Also imo we should all be ready to switch to Ladybird when the first version comes out, I know I’ll be running the Alpha. If you don’t know Ladybird is a brand new browser written from the ground up, it’s also open source.
  
  source
  - jjjalljs@ttrpg.network ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    
    I know it may be hard to believe if you only browse Lemmy (like myself), but the average person actually likes these so-called “AI” tools or at least a significant amount of them do.
    
    This is probably true but makes me sad. I tell all my friends not to use the lie machines but a bunch of people at work use them all the time.
    
    source
    Zetta@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    It is what it is. I do personally use LLMs because I recognize it is a tool that is actually good at some things, for instance, cursory research on something I’m working on that can get me a general idea of the knowledge I should be looking into to get the task done. Key aspect being I need to do all the follow up research from real sources to gather more data, and of course verify the assumptions from the LLM.
    
    The problem is people taking the word of the actually incredibly cool (on a math level) next best token generator as the truth of God. Its dumb people doing dumb things, problem is dumb people imo.
    
    source