Comment on It took years to come up with a plan to cut road deaths, and just 11 days to kill it
Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 days ago
I’ll be honest, I’m more interested in speed limits and road design within cities than I am in rural areas. But this is still a major loss for evidence-based policy. We’re not talking lowering the speed limit on major highways, just on minor, often poorly maintained, rural roads.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 days ago
The first comment I see when I look at the comments on the article is particularly upsetting:
Why we use trucks for freight as much we do is beyond me. Any route that sees more than 2 road trains per day should be served by rail. And maybe we could improve our passenger rail while we’re at it.
hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
Tony Abbott had Lindsay Fox “toys” on his prime ministerial book shelves as an examplw.
Why ? becase we keep.voting for politcans who have little interst in rail or oublic tranzport in general.
Even when we do something belated, like the Inland.Rail project, it doesn’t go to the port in Brisbane, nor carries in to port of Gladstone but ends in teucking depot in Brisbane.
As many people were killed by traffic murders on the day of the Boncli shootings as by gun.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 19 hours ago
Fuck that’s a good stat to have. Do you have a good source I can use to point to it?
Ixoid@aussie.zone 7 hours ago
There will be no source provided, except “Trust me, bro”, because is not true. Unless OP meant globally…
TheHolm@aussie.zone 1 day ago
Rail is bloody expensive to build and to maintain. Not to mention that you still need trucks to deliver from train station to the destination. Trucks makes much more sense.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 day ago
Absolutely untrue. Rail is insanely cheap to maintain, compared to roads. Especially roads taking heavy freight. The amount of damage a car does to the road increases by the 4th power of its weight. Meaning Carey twice the weight, do 16 time the damage to the road.
Plus, they can take much, much higher volumes of cargo. One train can carry as much as 4 road trains and not even be an especially noteworthy freight train. So operation costs are lower.
And they’re safer, since rails are not shared with cars and are a more controlled route.
Yes, upfront costs are higher, but after that it’s literally all wins.
TheHolm@aussie.zone 1 day ago
Very often you do not need “higher volumes of cargo.” And you still need trucks to get cargo from train to final destination. Rail is dead for a reason.