But the same could be said for Intel.
Examples that don’t involve shipping chips that need to be factory-overclocked and have higher power consumption just to match AMD’s chips: (also from: xda-developers.com/intel-core-i9-13900k-vs-amd-ry…)
For example, the Cinebench R23 results mentioned earlier had the Core i9 system consuming 461W of power, a whopping 110W higher than the 351W of the 7950X.
Only an Intel fanboy can be oblivious to this and pretend that Intel is still in the CPU race. It doesn’t even make sense when you add to that their anti-competitive practices. You shouldn’t need to bribe OEMs to offer as few AMD options as possible if you were confident in your own CPUs.
Nommer@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Even if you were correct, your obnoxious attitude would make me not care anyway. You’re lying to yourself if you believe at all that AMD has better CPUs. Intel has for a long time now the best single threaded performance. The other person laid it out for you nicely. I’m not much of an Intel fanboy but you types of people are just as obnoxios as apple users. Claim to know everything but completely wrong about it.
AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Summarized pretty much what you said there. I’m not even exaggerating as that’s what you literally said, and honestly, your first sentence is just pathetic. You deliberately say that you’re choosing to be ignorant because you took it personally when I said mean things about your Intel.