Comment

Comment on Diabolical

IzzyScissor@lemmy.world ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

verifiable evidence that the damage was pre-existing that the note leaver could somehow provide

Like a photo of the driver circling the car, unable to spot where the damage was, immediately after reading the note? Hmmmm…

Sort:hotnew top

vateso5074@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

If they had an existing ding on their car from smacking into a guard rail or opening their door into a post.

Reading comprehension.

source
- IzzyScissor@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  No, I read that - it’s just not substantial. If the ding already existed, my point is that the driver is overlooking it in the photo we’re seeing. That is proof that it is not new damage and shouldn’t be considered in this case. I get that you’re trying to CYA, but it doesn’t need to be to this degree of hyper-vigilance.
  
  source