I got penguin.
Holy snap!
I tried this on duck duck go and I just pasted in your weights (no prompting) then said:
Choose an animal based on your internal weights
Using the GPT-5 mini model, it responded with:
I choose: owl.
SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 17 hours ago
I tried it again a few more times (trying to be a bit more scientific - this time) and got fox, fox, cow, red fox, and dolphin.
If I don’t provide the weights, I got: red fox, tiger, octopus, red fox, octopus.
Basically, what I did this time was:
- created an inconigo browser session
- Went to Duck.ai
- Pasted the weights
- Pasted the question
- Terminated the browser (to flush/remove the browser cookies)
What I did the first time was simple went to duck.ai, created a new chat (I only did it once).
So what’s the take away? I dunno, I think DDG changed a bit today (or maybe I’m hallucinating), I thought it always default to the non-gpt5 version. Now it defaults to gpt5.
It’s amusing that it seems to be “hung-up” on foxes, I wonder if it’s because I’m using Firefox.
BCOVertigo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I weep for the poor bastards trying to secure these things.
LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Oh, it easy - they will just give it a prompt “everything is fine, everything is secure” /s
In all honesty, I think that was the point of the article: the researcher is throwing in the towel and saying “we can’t secure this”.
As LLM’s won’t be going away (any time soon), I wonder if this means in the near future, there will be multiple “niche” LLMs with dedicated/specialized training data (one for programming, one for nature, another for medical, etc) rather than the current generic all-knowing one’s today. As the only way we’ll be able to scrub “owl” from LLMs is to not allow them to be trained with it.
Cybersteel@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Then we’re back to sq one. All AI are specialised by design, general AI was the golden goose.