Comment on Anti-Trans Groups Want a Bathroom Ban. Judges Aren’t Giving Them One
Mongostein@lemmy.ca 19 hours ago
Non/gendered washrooms with floor-to-ceiling stalls, cameras allowed in the handwashing areas. Problem solved.
Comment on Anti-Trans Groups Want a Bathroom Ban. Judges Aren’t Giving Them One
Mongostein@lemmy.ca 19 hours ago
Non/gendered washrooms with floor-to-ceiling stalls, cameras allowed in the handwashing areas. Problem solved.
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 18 hours ago
Not a fan of putting up more surveillance in general, even less so in public toilets. Also what happens to the urinals in this scenario?
Denjin@feddit.uk 12 hours ago
Urinals are purely there to increase throughput and reduce cleaning time. Just get rid.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Increasing throughput and reducing cleaning time are both good things, though.
Increased throughput means less queuing and being able to quickly relieve yourself. In a shared toilet, this would benefit men and women alike.
Making cleaning quicker and easier means it’ll happen more and be less disruptive when it does happen.
Denjin@feddit.uk 8 hours ago
But if you want to make true ungendered toilets (as was suggested) that are accessible to all, having a section where a bunch of guys all basically get their cocks out and piss in a trough kinda prevents that.
Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 13 hours ago
You either have a completely different section or just get rid of them altogether