Comment on Mozilla’s new CEO is doubling down on an AI future for Firefox

• supernight52@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Only ever dealt with dog-shit programmers, huh?

  source

  • darkkite@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    an elitist response.

    here’s actual data survey.stackoverflow.co/2025/ai

    half use AI tools daily

    Professionals show a higher overall favorable sentiment (61%) than those learning to code (53%).

    source

    • ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Not elitist to say that people who use what are essentially weighted random word generators for programming, a career that requires one to know exactly how their code works in case it breaks, are bad at their jobs. Just like how it’s not elitist to say that generated images are not art, and that flying a plane into a building doesn’t make you a good pilot.

      source

      • darkkite@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        a career that requires one to know exactly how their code works in case it breaks

        Using AI doesn’t mean that you lose the ability to reason, debug, or test generated code. All code merge should be peer-reviewed and tested

        We’re not discussing images, nor planes.

        The claim was tech savvy people, the same people who are most opposed to AI.

        There’s data that to suggest otherwise. people who are technically inclined engage with AI more and have a more positive reception compared to less experienced users.

        Unless you have additional data to support that they are in-fact “dog-shit programmers”, this appears to be an emotional claim colored by your own personal bias. Though if you’re a “pure” programmer who is better than the dog-shit developers I would love to see some of your work or writings.

        source

        • -> View More Comments