Comment on I Went All-In on AI. The MIT Study Is Right.

• MangoCats@feddit.it ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  If you outsource you could at least sure them when things go wrong.

  Most outsourcing consultants I have worked with aren’t worth the legal fees to attempt to sue.

  Plus you can own the code if a person does it.

  I’m not aware of any ownership issues with code I have developed using Claude, or any other agents. It’s still mine, all the more so because I paid Claude to write it for me, at my direction.

  source

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    AI doesn’t get IP protections.

    source

    • MangoCats@feddit.it ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Nobody is asking it to (except freaks trying to get news coverage.)

      It’s like compiler output - no, I didn’t write that assembly code, gcc did, but it did it based on my instructions. My instructions are copyright by me, the gcc interpretation of them is a derivative work covered by my rights in the source code.

      When a painter paints a canvas, they don’t record the “source code” but the final work is also still theirs, not the brush maker or the canvas maker or paint maker (though some pigments get a little squirrely about that…)

      source

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        My instructions are copyright by me

        First, how much that is true is debatable. Second, that doesn’t matter as far as the output. No one can legally own that.

        source

        • -> View More Comments