I agree but look at that third paragraph, it has the dash that nobody ever uses. Tell tale signs right there
Comment on I Went All-In on AI. The MIT Study Is Right.
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 week agoI’ve heard that these tools aren’t 100% accurate, but your last point is valid.
pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 week ago
Sure, but plenty of journalists use the em-dash. That’s where LLMs got it from originally. It alone is not a signature of LLM use in journalistic articles (I’m not calling this CTO guy a journalist, to be clear)
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Context is everything. In publishing it’s standard; in online forums it’s either needlessly pretentious or AI and either way they deserve to be called out.
pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 days ago
When I mean “nobody uses it” I mean nobody other than people getting paid writing for a living would use it. This tech bro would not use that em dash and the quotation marks you can’t also find on the keyboard.
rimu@piefed.social 1 week ago
GPTZero is 99% accurate.
https://gptzero.me/news/gptzero-accuracy-stats/
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 week ago
I mean… has anyone other than the company that made the tool said so? Like from a third party?
rimu@piefed.social 1 week ago
The answer to that is literally in the first sentence of the body of the article I linked to.
Cmon, just put in a little bit of effort, please.
DSN9@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Ai says Ai correction tool about how crappy Ai is at coding’s article is 99 percent chance of being Ai, results generated by Ai. . .