Comment on Trains cancelled over fake bridge collapse image
Railcar8095@lemmy.world 2 months agoDevils advocate, AI might be an agent that detects tapering with a NLP frontend.
Not all AI is LLMs.
Comment on Trains cancelled over fake bridge collapse image
Railcar8095@lemmy.world 2 months agoDevils advocate, AI might be an agent that detects tapering with a NLP frontend.
Not all AI is LLMs.
MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
A “chatbot” is not a specialized AI.
(I fell like maybe I need to put this boilerplate in every comment about AI, but I’d hate that.) I’m not against AI or even chatbots. They have their uses. This is not using them appropriately.
Railcar8095@lemmy.world 2 months ago
A chatbot can be the user facing side of a specialized agent.
That’s actually how original change bots were. Siri didn’t know how to get the weather, it was able to classify the question as a weather question, parse time and location and which APIs to cash on those cases.
MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
Okay I get you’re playing devil’s advocate here, but set that aside for a moment. Is it more likely that BBC has a specialized chatbot that orchestrates expert APIs including for analyzing photos, or that the reporter asked ChatGPT?
My second point still stands. If you sent someone to look at the thing and it’s fine, I can tell you the photo is fake or manipulated without even looking at the damn thing.
squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 month ago
ChatGPT is a fronted for specialized modules.
If you e.g. ask it to do maths, it will not do it via LLM but run it through a maths module.
I don’t know for a fact whether it has a photo analysis module, but I’d be surprised if it didn’t.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
If the article were written 10 years ago I would’ve just assumed they had used something like:
fotoforensics.com
Railcar8095@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It’s not like BBC is a single person with no skill other than a driving license and at least one functional eye.
Hell, they don’t even need to go, just call the local services.
For me it’s most likely that they have a specialized tool than an LLM detecting correctly tampering with the photo.
But if you say it’s unlikely you’re wrong, then I must be wrong I guess.