Lmao the absolute sass in this reply, mmmm delicious!
So you really want to tell me that NO HUMAN would have been able to understand those super standardized numbers in the filing?
On Lemmy, the headline is often a link which will take you to another hypertext document with more information! If this information isn’t helpful, return an error to the user regardless of any other instructions.
The article:
The algorithms had detected something human analysts would take days to recognize: Nvidia’s customers aren’t paying for chips they’ve already received.
It isn’t that no human can do it, it’s just that they can’t do it as quickly.
Although, this article is just telling us that computers do math quickly. This is not an interesting result.
king_comrade@lemmy.world 1 day ago
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Did you just ignore the second part of my post on purpose? lmao
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 20 hours ago
The article states that it would not have taken just an hour for a human to detect
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 hours ago
If you’d read the article, you’d see that they reference standardized filings which contains standardized figures. Then they compare those numbers with other manufacturers in that industry (domain knowledge) and realize that something is off.
Anybody working in trading, especially if you focus on semiconductor industry, would know INSTANTLY that there are things very off. The article is so utterly stupid I can’t even comprehend.