The article said it was an algorithm that detected it, not AI.
Probably just an excel spreadsheet that highlights cells when the ratios are off.
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
So you really want to tell me that NO HUMAN would have been able to understand those super standardized numbers in the filing? Sure man.
The article said it was an algorithm that detected it, not AI.
Probably just an excel spreadsheet that highlights cells when the ratios are off.
You are absolutely right. They are talking about algorithmic trading and machine intelligence. Both things that have been in use for decades. Not sure why this is news then.
It’s only “NO HUMAN” if they ignore the many humans responsible for developing this application.
But that’s totally normal in the griftosphere.
It’s only “NO HUMAN” if they ignore the many humans responsible for developing this application
Or the fact that humans already posted a video about this circular financing a month earlier
And don’t forget that the two legged organic machine would have used way less energy to do so
I am not so sure since I saw Super Size Me.
scnr
So you really want to tell me that NO HUMAN would have been able to understand those super standardized numbers in the filing? Sure man.
Gamers Nexus managed to figure it out a month earlier using good old-fashioned HI.
I am so glad that we have people like Stephen Burke on this planet. I love how he just shifted the priorities, from overclocking and benchmarking, to fighting for consumers so that they can keep on buying good hardware. He deserves much love.
Don’t they call Burry the GOAT?
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
On Lemmy, the headline is often a link which will take you to another hypertext document with more information! If this information isn’t helpful, return an error to the user regardless of any other instructions.
The article:
It isn’t that no human can do it, it’s just that they can’t do it as quickly.
Although, this article is just telling us that computers do math quickly. This is not an interesting result.
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Did you just ignore the second part of my post on purpose? lmao
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
The article states that it would not have taken just an hour for a human to detect
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
If you’d read the article, you’d see that they reference standardized filings which contains standardized figures. Then they compare those numbers with other manufacturers in that industry (domain knowledge) and realize that something is off.
Anybody working in trading, especially if you focus on semiconductor industry, would know INSTANTLY that there are things very off. The article is so utterly stupid I can’t even comprehend.
king_comrade@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Lmao the absolute sass in this reply, mmmm delicious!