Comment on What do you think about the renewables vs nuclear debate?

ex_06@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

There are 3 big political cons that are missing in your list:

Said that, I never support the ''renewables are intermittent'' point... Right now they have this issue because they are in low number and there are stocking issue and it's mostly one source per place (like solar in sunny places and hydro in mountain places). We can have waaaaaayy more solar panels, wind turbines etc. Saying right now they are intermittent is just a biased point.

I agree with @sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net , anything practical would do. Right now it's late to have nuclear energy in a lot of places, so the discussion is even kinda pointless, we don't have 30years and mld of euros to build them before the climate really hits us. Even if we start now, we still need something else quicker to build and other ways to reduce the usage! (a lot of ''pro nuclear'' people think that we just need a lot of nuclear to then keep doing everything we do now cause clean energy = no emissions)

So ye, I think it's good to use nuclear and to not close the centrals that are already up, but using ''let's build more'' is not a practical plan right now. We are late :)

source
Sort:hotnewtop