Comment on AI finds errors in 90% of Wikipedia's best articles
echodot@feddit.uk 9 hours agoBut we don’t know what the false positive rate is either? How many submissions were blocked that shouldn’t have been, it seems like you don’t have a way to even find that metric out unless somebody complained about it.
AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 8 hours ago
It isn’t doing anything automatically. It’s just flagging submissions for human review. “Hey, maybe have a look at this one”. So if it falsely flags something it shouldn’t, which is common, I simply ignore it. And as I said, that error rate is moderate but it’s still successful enough to be quite useful.