Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good
aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 13 hours ago
There is no voting system that fulfills all the Condercet criteria; they all have some corner case
otp@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
chunes@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Yes, it’s very interesting.
Ranked choice’s corner case is non-monotonicity, meaning you can harm your chosen candidate by ranking him higher. That’s why I prefer something like range voting.
aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 4 hours ago
I also prefer range or approval voting
logicbomb@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
What is your reason for saying that?
Just saying something negative makes it seem like it’s a bad idea, but that just encourages people not to change at all. A voting system that tries to satisfy the Condorcet criteria will be far better than any FPTP system.
It’s easier to tear down than it is to build up. What’s your proposed alternative?
aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 12 hours ago
Did you make a similar comment to OP, who only spoke negatively of a well-used and well-understood system?
What is OP’s proposed alternative? What’s a realistic plan to get there?
logicbomb@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Did you make a similar comment to OP, who only spoke negatively of a well-used and well-understood system?
What is OP’s proposed alternative? What’s a realistic plan to get there?
Here’s what OP said in the body of their post.
Most european countries use 2 round elections or proportional representation.
Although I’m not sure when they wrote that. The post was edited, so it’s possible that it wasn’t there when you first saw the post, and didn’t re-check the post before writing this comment.
locuester@lemmy.zip 2 hours ago
Correct!!
youtu.be/qf7ws2DF-zk
Everyone loves to whine about the system when a corner case hits, but they all have corner cases. You have to pick your poison.