Genuinely curious: What advantage would you have from running it in a docker container?
Comment on CopyParty is kind of a great file server
SiblingNoah@piefed.social 3 days ago
Had to choose a file server setup recently. Ended up with Filebrowser Quantum.
Copyparty is awesome, but it seems happiest on bare metal instead of Docker. The Docker setup and documentation, especially when adding reverse proxies and authentication (like Authentik) is just not there yet.
I’m looking forward to giving it another look in a year.
gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 days ago
kossa@feddit.org 1 day ago
All config with docker is the same, so basically every service is kind of maintained and especially backuped the same.
Plus, config is just files. If the server is dead, copy volumes and compose files to new machines, two commands, all services up again. No difference in how to deploy some services.
clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
What is the problem with their docker implementation? I use it for more than one year and had no issues yet.