Comment on Israel’s IDF Bans Android Phones—iPhones Now ‘Mandatory’
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 day agoOk. Maybe you’re right about all of that. I would have no way of knowing. Just like I still have no way of knowing that you’re right about android security. From many things I’ve read over the years, I’d lean toward iOS being less secure. But even if I never read any of that, it logically just wouldn’t add up that one platform would be much more secure than the other. I do know that they’ve been marketing themselves as all about privacy and security and that’s easily seen to be a pack of lies from light-years away. So given that I’m back to assuming they probably are less secure if anything.
prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 day ago
Go read what graphene OS has to say about iOS then.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yes, you know the Dunning Kruger effect which states that if someone admits to not knowing everything, that shows weakness. Whereas someone claiming to know it all? Well they’re clearly omnipotent.
Iphones are trash. Zero reason to believe they’re more secure, and I doubt you’ll convince anyone otherwise. The commenter you claim not to see made a good point. Israel banned Android phones because they want to reliably spy on the IDF to prevent leaks. Not to help the IDF keep their data secure lol
scytale@piefed.zip 1 day ago
But the article is specifically saying they are forcing iphones because they are more locked down and less susceptible to compromise. And yes, we don’t know if they’re lying. However, the commenter just linked an unrelated article about celebrite’s claim about cracking an iphone. That doesn’t mean they are connected, and that doesn’t mean Android isn’t less compromisible. I’ve taken some device forensics classes albeit not as deep into smartphones like the person you’re arguing with, but I do think they have some merit with their argument.
prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 day ago
They’re also saying this is only for official use, so they should have access to the devices via MDM.
This doesn’t ban personal devices being Android.
The person who is arguing with me is just on an anti Apple knee jerk
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 day ago
My point is that I don’t think apple is more secure. They’re probably similar but given apple wants me to believe they are super secure and private, they probably are telling me that for a self serving reason which needs to be said because it specifically is not true. I see no reason to believe them at all. I definitely disagree with you about not knowing if the Israeli government is lying. Pretty safe to say at this point that if they find something important enough to state, it’s almost always going to be a lie.
prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 day ago
My dude I’m not interested in attempting to have an informed conversation with someone who isn’t informed.
The sunning Kruger effect isn’t when someone who knows what they’re talking about has to refute baseless claims.
Take care, enjoy your vitriol and contempt. You’ve earned it
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The apple cult is the second strongest brainwashing campaign of my lifetime. You enjoy that, and I’ll continue shifting to whatever option seems better as time moves forward. Apple will never change for the better, so I can pretty safely say there’s only one known direction I’ll never move in. You enjoy your shitty walled garden of lies.
prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 day ago
My dude this for official use, they ought to already have MDM on official devices. Thats like saying they want them using a specific phone so they can read the email they administer separately.
I think you’re woefully misunderstanding