You’re referring to consent, but that’s not what this meme is about. And if these guys don’t take no for an answer, then women should cover their drinks, yes?
Comment on The reason women cover their drinks
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 9 hours agono, he is saying it takes two people and if just one of them says no, it does not happen.
Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz 9 hours ago
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 7 hours ago
And if these guys don’t take no for an answer, then women should cover their drinks,
you can cover whatever you want, it is your drink. this discussion is about the fact that they found women that said yes and those allowing them to spread their genes. miller - 3 kids, hagseth - 4 kids, vance - 3 kids.
Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz 6 hours ago
You and one other person changed the conversation to be about that by blaming women for procreating with awful men instead of blaming these men for being awful.
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 5 hours ago
that by blaming women
stating a fact is stating a fact, not “blaming anyone”.
Devial@discuss.online 9 hours ago
Yes. And the fathers are equally capable of saying no. And the men themselves are equally capable of not being cunts.
There’s 3 people involved here, so of which are men, and this guy specifically singles out the the one woman, and blames here. That’s sexist and mysoginstic.
“When women are bad, it’s their fault. When men are bad, it’s their mother’s fault” is an objectively sexist and shitty stance to have.
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 9 hours ago
no, you are just making up bullshit just so you have something to get mad about. he is saying if no woman would spread legs for these assholes, they would not reproduce.
yes, it would be nice if they weren’t assholes in the first place, but since they are, there is one more threshold where spreading their assholism(is that a word?) onto another generation can be stopped.
that’s just a fact, there is no misogyny, so you climb back of your high horse before you fell down and hit your head.