So you gotta understand, I’m a history buff with a financial background that dabbles in cybersecurity. So like this is me speculating based on my own view.
Do you have any sources that cite figures that would suggest this? To be honest, I have my doubts
Can you be more specific? I want to give you a high quality response when I have time.
DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Thank you, I really appreciate that.
Figures and/or examples would be very interesting for:
The statement that LLMs will continue to develop rapidly and/or that their output will improve in quality. I currently assume that development will slow down considerably—for example, with regard to hallucinations, where it was assumed for some time that the problem could be solved by more extensive training data, but this has proven to be a dead end.
The statement that the value of the companies involved can be justified in any way with real-world assets. Or, at any rate, reliable statements about how existing or planned data centers built for this purpose can be operated economically despite their considerable running costs.
How you justify your statement that it would be realistic to replace human workers on a large scale. Examples where this is the case would be interesting (by this I don’t mean figures on where workers have been laid off, but examples of companies where human work has been (successfully) made obsolete by LLMs – I am not aware of any such examples where this has happened in a significant way and attributable to the use of LLMs.
I am aware that the technology is being used in warfare. I am not aware of its significance or the tactical advantages it is supposed to offer. Please provide examples of what you mean.