Comment on OnLy tWo eLemEnTs
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 days agoIt doesn’t matter what arguments I give you, you’re dug in. That’s what’s boring - every new angle anyone tries with you just gets the same old tired “my science is correct and infallible, yours is wrong” response. “Arguments” like that are boring. 🤷
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
You’re welcome to spice things up with any sort of support for your argument. It is kind of boring to keep repeating “No, let’s not reject science” I’ll admit, but you’re certainly not providing anything of value.
I’ll help you out. Here’s a link someone else provided (ironically supporting my point exactly):
medium.com/…/letter-to-the-us-president-and-congr…
and
and
Real biology right there. From real biologists. You’re not arguing with me, you’re arguing with the scientific consensus as now explained to you directly from said consensus. Reality doesn’t care about whether or not it bores you. It’s true regardless.
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Are you serious? Like, you can’t be serious at this point. I sent that article to you, like 4 comments ago. We’ve already discussed it, in this very thread. 🥱
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Apologies, mixed up threads. So you agree that the article supports my point exactly. To quote: “In animals and plants, binary sex is universally defined by gamete type, even though sexes vary in how they are developmentally determined and phenotypically identified across taxa.”
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
No, I still don’t agree with the same incorrect bullshit you’ve been saying for the past 36 hours now