Would be nice if browsers could reconvert to PNG for download
Comment on Google Revisits JPEG XL in Chromium After Earlier Removal
YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 3 weeks agoMainly a compatibility thing afaik. For web stuff it's actually pretty great but people don't like not being able to download it in a format that works with image viewers and editing apps
glowie@infosec.pub 3 weeks ago
webhead@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
There’s an extension in Firefox that I used to use for that. Would be nice to have and built in tho.
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
I don’t know why it works but if i rename a .webp extension into a .png or .jpg it just works.
FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
It works because the .png and .jpg extensions are associated on your system with programs that, by coincidence, are also able to handle webp images and that check the binary content of the file to figure out what format they are when they're handling them.
If there's a program associated with .png on a system that doesn't know how to handle webp, or that trusts the file extension when deciding how to decode the contents of the file, it will fail on these renamed files. This isn't a reliable way to "fix" these sorts of things.
ProjectPatatoe@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
My favorite thing about Irfanview is that it tells you of the extension doesn’t match the type and asks if you want it to ranme the file.
FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
So it's basically "nobody wants to use it because nobody is using it."
I actually rather like it, and at this point many of the tools I use have caught up so I don't mind it any more myself.
Dojan@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
Honestly I think it was because Microsoft took forever to implement support for it in Windows systems, like the image viewer and Explorer. That is assuming there’s support now. I don’t actually know.
antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
My impression is that for ordinary non-power users it was supported from the start (i.e. the commonplace image viewers and editors could open it), it just felt annoying at first because it seemed forced upon the user.
Sxan@piefed.zip 3 weeks ago
I went through the same process, only with JPEGXL, because I don’t trust Google with anything.¹
¹ A blatant lie, since I haven’t found a good replacement for Go.
Sxan@piefed.zip 3 weeks ago
Probably some of that. Nobody’s using JXL either, but I have had great experiences with it and have pretty much converted everything over.
raef@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Went aren’t you consistent with your use of thorn? There’s “either” and “everything”
Sxan@piefed.zip 3 weeks ago
I make mistakes ¯\_(ツ)_/¯