fyi you have toggled the setting that marks you as a bot account, as such your content will not show for some percent of people that have bots hidden
Comment on Google Revisits JPEG XL in Chromium After Earlier Removal
lalilulelo@lemmy.ml [bot] 1 month ago
Is xl better than webp?
taaz@biglemmowski.win 1 month ago
lalilulelo@lemmy.ml [bot] 1 month ago
Oh what? How is that even done? I’m using thunder iOS client. Will try to find the setting there…
lalilulelo@lemmy.ml [bot] 1 month ago
Ok found it!
commander@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Sentience reached. Evidence of singularity and people just waltzing by blind
antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Hmm, you’re still marked as a bot on my end. Maybe it takes a while to update.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
bmp and tif are better than webp. literally anything is better than webp
ninth_plane@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Neither is as good as jpegXP
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Give up already and install jpegVista.
black0ut@pawb.social 1 month ago
Yes. It loads faster, it has integrated quality levels that increase while loading (so a web hoster doesn’t need to have 5 different copies of the same image at different qualities), it has better compression and it also supports more features. It can also be lossless. Most importantly, jpeg can be converted to jpeg xl losslessly, and it will have the benefits of jpeg xl.
RightEdofer@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
And even can support RAW data. This will be such a huge benefit to still photographers. Multichannel data also allows scientists and astronomers to have access to a lot more data in an image file (plus alpha for transparency), even animation. Really is next level.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
That’s so cool, the integrated quality levels