fyi you have toggled the setting that marks you as a bot account, as such your content will not show for some percent of people that have bots hidden
Comment on Google Revisits JPEG XL in Chromium After Earlier Removal
lalilulelo@lemmy.ml [bot] 3 days ago
Is xl better than webp?
taaz@biglemmowski.win 3 days ago
lalilulelo@lemmy.ml [bot] 2 days ago
Oh what? How is that even done? I’m using thunder iOS client. Will try to find the setting there…
lalilulelo@lemmy.ml [bot] 2 days ago
Ok found it!
commander@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Sentience reached. Evidence of singularity and people just waltzing by blind
antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Hmm, you’re still marked as a bot on my end. Maybe it takes a while to update.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
bmp and tif are better than webp. literally anything is better than webp
ninth_plane@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Neither is as good as jpegXP
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Give up already and install jpegVista.
black0ut@pawb.social 2 days ago
Yes. It loads faster, it has integrated quality levels that increase while loading (so a web hoster doesn’t need to have 5 different copies of the same image at different qualities), it has better compression and it also supports more features. It can also be lossless. Most importantly, jpeg can be converted to jpeg xl losslessly, and it will have the benefits of jpeg xl.
RightEdofer@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
And even can support RAW data. This will be such a huge benefit to still photographers. Multichannel data also allows scientists and astronomers to have access to a lot more data in an image file (plus alpha for transparency), even animation. Really is next level.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
That’s so cool, the integrated quality levels