Comment on It's the only logical future, captain.
Kowowow@lemmy.ca 15 hours agoI’m not sure there’s a single syllable that fits the whole plus so I guess you drop it and kind force inclusion by implying it
Comment on It's the only logical future, captain.
Kowowow@lemmy.ca 15 hours agoI’m not sure there’s a single syllable that fits the whole plus so I guess you drop it and kind force inclusion by implying it
zloubida@sh.itjust.works 14 hours ago
That’s called invisibilization of women. The French language, which is my mother tongue, does that a lot, and we’re fighting against that.
GraniteM@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
I’ve heard arguments for the opposite: women who act should be called actors, not actresses, the logic being that the -ess suffix is diminutive, so all actors should just be actors. It seems like there are perfectly reasonable arguments to be made for either side.
zloubida@sh.itjust.works 2 hours ago
It may be possible in English, I’m not competent enough to have a strong opinion.
In French, as all words are gendered, the things are different.
Zorque@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
The distinction, or ignoring the distinction?
zloubida@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
The invisibilization.