They have the choice to not go up against the wall by relinquishing their right of ownership over property they are not utilizing. If they wish to selfishly hold onto that private ownership so they can personally enrich themselves, then up against the wall they go.
Soggy@lemmy.world 5 days ago
So your position is literally “impoverish yourself by donating all property you aren’t currently, personally using.” I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.
Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 5 days ago
That’s a nice slippery slope you made there but I never said to impoverish oneself.
You still have your own job which should be providing for you and your lifestyle. You don’t need an extra house. So you either be a decent person and give it to someone in need or you be another owning class leech who wishes to exploit someone’s basic need for personal enrichment.