Comment on [deleted]

<- View Parent
Ten_forward@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

No, I’m saying by the time of Voyager this teleporter clone technology could very well have been figured out. It seems a wasted opportunity to not take advantage of that storyline and open up anyone more ethical dilemmas.

There is no situation in which you can put it into practice and have it be a solution to the problem.

I see absolutely no reason why not.

You will not get his consent. Ever. He doesn’t want to die.

I can’t imagine why he wouldn’t be in favor of the plan, especially since he is half Vulcan. It’s a very logical solution to the issue.

Just because you clone someone doesn’t mean that logically they’re going to go “Oh, well I guess, I can die if it means that another version of me lives.”

Again I see absolutely no reason not to.

He was acting on a survival instinct. He’s not going to override that just because there’s a clone.

There’s no reason he’d have to…

Which means you must still make the decision that Janeway made. You STILL MUST decide whether to kill Tuvix or let him live.

Of course, but this way they can all coexist. I see it as an absolute win win for everyone.

apart because you’re back to the same argument that was made at the start.

I definitely disagree. The argument is the cost of Tuvix, my solution preserves Tuvix. I’m not sure you understand what I’m proposing or are just not accepting that in this case there is no real death of anyone.

Do you have the right to execute one man to save the lives of two others?

When you can simultaneously preserve the life, absolutely!

source
Sort:hotnewtop