Comment on [deleted]
Ten_forward@startrek.website 1 year agoThe Riker example was just one of many wasn’t it? The “transporter clone” trope has been around since StarTrek: The Original Series when Captain Kirk was replicated by accident. As well as recent trek canon when Boimler was replicated on StarTrek: Lower Decks.
From an in-universe perspective, given the numerous transporter accidents throughout Starfleet’s history, it would seem logical that Starfleet would invest resources into understanding these anomalies to prevent unintended duplications or other mishaps. Transporter technology is complex and interacts with a myriad of environmental conditions, which might explain why these accidents, while rare in the context of all transport operations, still happen occasionally.
Voyager could have taken the next steps and introduced a new level of control over the technology by relying on Starfleet, had it thoroughly investigated and understood these incidents. I don’t see why they might not have developed protocols or technologies to recreate such anomalies intentionally. This could have provided Captain Janeway with an additional solution to the Tuvix dilemma.
Also as for which to kill, that would of course be up to Tuvix - which without his consent this would be moot. The logical one I suppose would be the original Tuvix only to lower the number of possible variables in the “separation.”
Stamets@startrek.website 1 year ago
Kirk wasn’t cloned, he was split into two different versions of himself that contained different parts of his personality/ego. A clone needs to be a copy, not a lower resolution version of the character. Also Boimler was re-created through the same fashion that Riker was. It also happened 20ish years after Voyager left for the Delta Quadrant.
They do. Starfleets whole thing is exploration and study. During the episodes where there have been clones you see a vast amount of information that’s uncovered. Testing is done to see what happened and how to prevent it from happening again in the future.
This doesn’t make sense. You’re asking Voyager, who is tens of thousands of lightyears from known space, to somehow recreate an anomaly. They do not have the level of study of each planet that would be required to find a suitable testbed. They also do not have the time. They’re looking for ways to get home. The anomalies they’ve stopped and encountered along the way (without being pushed into investigating by aliens) have been overwhelmingly to either further the goal of getting home faster or to supply the ship with necessities for the trip. Moreover, there’s the fact that the transporter cloning incidents were pure anomalies. Just because Starfleet studied them and knows what happens does not mean that they’re able to recreate it. We’ve seen numerous times that Starfleet can understand a phenomena but can’t replicate it. You’re asking way too much of a small science vessel stranded in the Delta Quadrant.
That’s the pint I am trying to make. You will not get his consent. Ever. He doesn’t want to die. Just because you clone someone doesn’t mean that logically they’re going to go “Oh, well I guess, I can die if it means that another version of me lives.” He was acting on a survival instinct. He’s not going to override that just because there’s a clone. Which means you must still make the decision that Janeway made. You STILL MUST decide whether to kill Tuvix or let him live. Your cloning idea might be a nice idea but that’s all it is. An idea. When put into practice it immediately falls apart because you’re back to the same argument that was made at the start. Do you have the right to execute one man to save the lives of two others? The issue of the episode isn’t “Tuvix is a unique lifeform and then must be saved”. It’s “Do you have the right to kill someone in order to save others?” If you add a transporter clone into that mix the question doesn’t change.
The transporter clone option is a nice idea but that’s all it is. An idea. There is no situation in which you can put it into practice and have it be a solution to the problem.
Ten_forward@startrek.website 1 year ago
No, I’m saying by the time of Voyager this teleporter clone technology could very well have been figured out. It seems a wasted opportunity to not take advantage of that storyline and open up anyone more ethical dilemmas.
I see absolutely no reason why not.
I can’t imagine why he wouldn’t be in favor of the plan, especially since he is half Vulcan. It’s a very logical solution to the issue.
Again I see absolutely no reason not to.
There’s no reason he’d have to…
Of course, but this way they can all coexist. I see it as an absolute win win for everyone.
I definitely disagree. The argument is the cost of Tuvix, my solution preserves Tuvix. I’m not sure you understand what I’m proposing or are just not accepting that in this case there is no real death of anyone.
When you can simultaneously preserve the life, absolutely!
Stamets@startrek.website 1 year ago
Transporter clones are not that simple. When they occur it’s because of a strange anomaly. Just because something does happen doesn’t mean that they’ll be able to recreate it. Everytime they’ve happened it’s been either because of situations beyond their control or due to a complete accident.
I have literally told you why. You keep ignoring it. You cannot use transporter clones to solve this problem when the problem is “do you have the right to kill them”. A transporter clone does NOTHING other than add another person to kill. Just because you have a backup doesn’t mean you suddenly are granted free murder rights.
He was also half-vulcan during his freakout on the bridge. Logic dictates to get your crewmen back. You are in stranded space. You are now relying on one individual to take the responsibilities of two roles. It is logical to separate Tuvix. Loved ones got their loved ones back, the responsibilities were no longer collated into a single person, and a lack of complex/new biology makes it easier for Sick Bay. It is not logical to run around on the bridge screaming for people to not kill you. Logic doesn’t seem to make much difference to Tuvix. That was also established in the episode itself where he acted based off of hunches and thoughts, not facts and opinion. Moreover, this is a survival mechanism. HE doesn’t want to die. Just because someone else is going to live his life doesn’t mean anything. He isn’t the one who is going to live that life. You are not giving the emotional situation here the weight it overwhelmingly deserves. Especially when the character never acted logical.
You know, except for the Tuvix that you have to kill. A decision that is now made WAY more cold by using a transporter clone. Janeway was put in a tough decision and had to make a rough call. The option you’re providing turns Janeway into a coldblooded killer who has already pre-emptively decided to kill but wants to have her cake and eat it too. I find it way more fucked up to have her resigned to already killing a man instead of being choked up making that decision.
No, that is not the argument and has never been the argument. The argument has always been “Does Janeway have the right to kill Tuvix?” That is literally the argument that’s made in the episode.
Then, even though there wasn’t a clone, Janeway was in the right.
Ten_forward@startrek.website 1 year ago
100% she was perfectly justified.
We simply disagree on this. The argument is exactly whether or not the life of Tuvix is worth the cost of two lives… I am not sure why you seem to disagree but we will have to end it there.