Comment on Jack Dorsey Releases Vine Reboot Where AI Content Is Banned
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 days agoI think such a filter wouldn’t function well enough to keep up, such is the case with search engines which offer the feature, and instead a 0 tolerance ban would be the only effective method.
Perspectivist@feddit.uk 2 days ago
Zero tolerance ban still requires a method of detecting AI content in order to enforce said ban. Having such detection system in place would then just as well give people the option to choose for themselves whether they want to see such content or not. Ofcourse such filter isn’t 100% accurate but neither is a total ban. Some of that content will always get through.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Humans can make reports to contribute to banning accounts and even IPs that prove problematic.
Humans contributing tags for filters would be like fighting the tide with a spoon.
Perspectivist@feddit.uk 2 days ago
Isn’t that what you’re literally advocating for here? I don’t see the practical difference between having users reporting AI content versus users reporting AI content that isn’t correctly labeled as such.
I stand behind what I said. Give people the option to filter it out of their own feeds if they want to. I don’t wish to push my own content preferences onto people with different tastes. Curating your own feed is the way to go. Not top down control from the tech companies themselves.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You don’t see a practical difference between tagging an image and removing the source of the images? Really? You can’t figure it out when its been spelled out for you? You, specifically you, have a hard time understanding? You’re not piecing the mystery together, yet? Your wheels are turning on this colossal conundrum?
Hey bud, mull it over for a bit and let me know if you figure it out. Smh.