And my point was they’re already doing this in the face of regulation.
Comment on Surprise EU rollback of 'GDPR' digital-rights rules prompts alarm
FaceDeer@fedia.io 15 hours agoDid you read the article? It says that making AI training easier is a key purpose of these changes.
ag10n@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
BakerBagel@midwest.social 10 hours ago
See, my first thought would be to crack down on the tech parasites that are ruining out society instead of changing the law to accommodate them. But I’m just a dumb American who lives in a place where corporations are allowed to do whatever they want including killing whistleblowers, but I’m sure that the fascist parties taking power in Europe won’t do that.
FaceDeer@fedia.io 14 hours ago
Then why change the rules? The article's author seems quite convinced that this will make AI training easier.
ag10n@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Because they want to strip the right to privacy so they can better monetize
Naive to think the GDPR is stopping anyone now.
FaceDeer@fedia.io 13 hours ago
Naive to think the GDPR is stopping anyone now.
So again, why change the rules? If the GDPR is already ineffective there's no need to loosen it more.
Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 hours ago
Sounds like the problem is lack of enforcement of the existing laws rather than the existing laws being bad.
To provide an extreme example, just because there’s a wave of murders doesn’t mean murder should be made legal.
WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Why should any of us approve of making things easier for technofascists?
FaceDeer@fedia.io 14 hours ago
Did I say you should approve of it? I'm just explaining why it comes as no surprise to me.
fonix232@fedia.io 9 hours ago
Why do you presume that all AI advancement is purely by technofascists?
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 8 hours ago
The kind of “AI advancement” that requires stripping away privacy rights is definitely done by technofascists.