It’s only wrong when done for profit.
Otherwise you’re just having their material as data for an algorithm and a personal use case.
It’s only wrong when done for profit.
Otherwise you’re just having their material as data for an algorithm and a personal use case.
Sneptaur@pawb.social 1 year ago
I don’t know what someone would use AI art for “personal use” aside from trying to make some sort of porn or something for themselves
c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Use the voices for a film project or machinima if you want, use the picture generation models to create wallpapers, it’s not my fault you insist on being obtuse about this by pretending you can’t figure out a use case that isn’t based around making money.
Sneptaur@pawb.social 1 year ago
A film project or a machinima that I won’t be posting online or sharing with anyone? AI art generally doesn’t look very good, so I wouldn’t want to stare at it all day only to notice the imperfections all over it. Idk about you but it seems like these models are designed specifically to avoid paying talented people for their work. Simple as that. If we didn’t have capitalism they would simply not exist
c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This website is all the same, just a bunch of luddites mad that technology and advancement is killing jobs. Combines took farming jobs, quickbooks took accounting jobs, AI will take data entry and artist’s jobs.
The ONLY way to get off capitalism is to automate the economy via robotics and machine learning models, it’s the only way we could ever achieve a stateless society economically.
Put down the crack pipe, any society looking to create a more socialist -> communist economy has developed and leaned on automation to do so. Nothing about that is going to change.