Comment

Comment on DeepMind’s cofounder: Generative AI is just a phase. What’s next is interactive AI.

You don’t need a scientific genius to deduce that - even I did it! One of the most impressive things for me about ChatGPT has been the ability to “undestand” what you mean, properly communicate with you. For the time being it’s not hooked up to anything but it shouldn’t be too hard to make it translate our natural language requests (which it already “understands”) into software commands. The possibilities are endless.

source

Sort:hotnew top

SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
If only it understood instead of “understood”

source
- Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Meaning what? It needs Cartesian Dualist qualia floating around between its wires and transistors, or else it’s just a word vending machine? What’s the demonstrable test for understanding vs “understanding”?
  
  source
  - SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I’m not saying I have a definition or way to get there, just that it actually hasn’t demonstrated that it actually understands (through the tasks where it fails)
    
    source
    Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I still don’t understand what you mean. If you don’t have a criterion for “actually” understanding, how has it demonstrably failed?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
redempt@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Langchain

source
- Pantoffel@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  That’s just a toolbox and in my experience a pretty limited one as well. What OP means is that Gen AI doesn’t connect to your Emails, Photoshop, your IDE, your browser, and what not with text or speech.
  
  Imagine not using your keyboard and mouse anymore, but only using your speech and natural language for everything (not commands, but natural language).
  
  source
  - redempt@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    computer, make me a sandwich
    
    source