Comment on Sora might have a 'pervert' problem on its hands

• Taco2112@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Love this bit

  But there is something different and unsettling here: It’s people being able to use my face (easily) to create content for potential sexual gratification without my consent.

  But she did consent when she allowed people to use her face. I’m not saying what those people are doing with it are morally right but she consented when she clicked the box allowing cameos.

  source

  • missingno@fedia.io ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    As a journalist she did it to see what would happen. And then wrote an article about what happened. This is definitely worth talking about even if she did click the box, the box isn't really the point here.

    source
  • balsoft@lemmy.ml ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    She consented to something but didn’t consider/understand what that something implies. While it might be obvious for terminally online people, most people don’t expect “cameos” to necessarily mean “fetish porn cameos”.

    source

    • krashmo@lemmy.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      What else would it mean? That’s the kind of content the internet creates.

      source

      • otp@sh.itjust.works ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        What else would it mean? That’s the kind of content the internet creates.

        a centaur-woman pregnant with octoplets

        You may have spent too much of your lifetime on the internet if you think that this should be common knowledge, haha

        (I say that as someone who probably fits into that category)

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • balsoft@lemmy.ml ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I assume many people just live in a sanitized, sterile internet created by Google/Meta et al. They might have never encountered the gooner/pervert culture before. Again, when most people see “cameo” their mind doesn’t jump to “fetish porn cameo”. As such, I don’t think there was real consent here.

        source
      • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        If someone expects content moderation or the other safeguards you have in large parts of the internet it might come as a surprise that a large platform allows fetish porn content to be made with “cameos”.

        Tbh, the word itself is super vague and ambiguous and doesn’t reflect what it means.

        source
    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      She consented to something but didn’t consider/understand what that something implies.

      so… she’s stupid?

      source
  • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The question is what did she consent to (as in, what was the thing she did expect that this checkbox created)?

    “Cameo” doesn’t exactly evoke “allow people to create fetish porn with my face”.

    If the button was labelled with that or some other more clear text, I don’t think there would have been a need for this article.

    And that’s pretty much the point of this article: “Beware of corporate double-speek, this harmless word here means ‘allow fetish porn with your face’”, and that kind of warning article is not only important but pretty much essential in today’s world, where “autopilot” doesn’t mean that the car is fully self-driving, and where even “full self-driving” doesn’t mean “fully self-driving”.

    As Marc-Uwe Kling said: “Die Welt ist voll von Arschlöchern. Rechtlich abgesicherten Arschlöchern.”

    “The world is full of assholes. Legally protected assholes.”

    source