Comment on Sam Altman Says If Jobs Gets Wiped Out, Maybe They Weren’t Even “Real Work” to Start With
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 weeks agoYou missed the psychology part?
Comment on Sam Altman Says If Jobs Gets Wiped Out, Maybe They Weren’t Even “Real Work” to Start With
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 weeks agoYou missed the psychology part?
jungle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
No, I saw it, but I was replying to the “please stop calling it AI” part. This is a computer science term, not a psychology term. Psychologists have no business discussing what computer scientists call these systems
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
What do i even answer here…
jungle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Ah, I see. We in the software industry are no longer allowed to use our own terms because outsiders Co-opted them.
Noted.
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
The solution to the public misusing technical terms isn’t to change the technical terms, but to educate the public. All of the following fall under AI:
AI is a broad field, and you probably interact with non-LLM variants every day, whether you notice or not. Here’s a Wikipedia article that goes through a lot of it. LLMs/GPT are merely one small subfield in the larger field of AI.
MangoCats@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
The problem with AI in a “popular context” is that it has been a forever moving target. Old mechanical adding machines were better at correctly summing columns of numbers than humans, at the time they were considered a limited sort of artificial intelligence. All along the spectrum it continues. 5 years ago, image classifiers that can sit and watch video feeds 24-7, accurately identifying things that happen in the feed with better than human accuracy (accounting for human lack of attention, coffee breaks, distracting phone calls, etc.) those were amazing feats of AI - at the time, and now they’re “just image classifiers” much as Alpha-Zero “just plays games.”