Comment on Futo updates their website, removing logos, clarifying micro grants
Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day agoSo immch is dead before it even matured enough to be reliable? Sad.
Comment on Futo updates their website, removing logos, clarifying micro grants
Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day agoSo immch is dead before it even matured enough to be reliable? Sad.
extremeboredom@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Still struggling to understand what makes it “dead.”
beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 21 hours ago
It’s a big disappointment because the facial recognition is great, meaning that they could be doing bad things behind the scene. They could have a backdoor so their buddies could check to see if you’re Hispanic or non-white. That’s just one thing. Could is not is. But its enough to make me stop and think of uninstalling.
Railcar8095@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
It’s still open source, not sure where this is coming from
3abas@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
It’s coming from technical ignorance. There’s little wrong with FUTOs license, here are the limitations:
First the good:
Yes, good, I don’t want Google using my code to make billions.
And the not so good:
Bad. If I forked and majorly modified the code by significant contribution, I don’t see why my release should have a “donate” link to the original producer and not for my efforts the donor is actually using. This is the same problem the first limitation seeks to address, but from a different angle; namely: monetizing “intellectual property” instead of work.
Copyleft is cool because it means freedom, but everyone in here fighting because code first prevents them from potentially monetizing the projects they like is completely missing the point of copyleft.
If you ask them to articulate their concern, I haven’t heard one that isn’t on the lines of “I want to be able to use this code in my paid product”…
extremeboredom@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
A backdoor in what, exactly?? Please do some research into the programs you’re running so you can base your opinions on that knowledge rather than vibes.