Comment on Futo updates their website, removing logos, clarifying micro grants

• P13@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Funded a team of devs to work on it full time.

  source

  • isthereanydeal@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Pls explain. I cannot see how it is shareware with an AGPL licence behind it and full code published. Or is it just fud ?

    source

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      fud, it’s “shareware” in the sense that there’s a dismissable popup that asks you to pretty please pay 100$, but it’s AGPLv3 and no features are locked behind the paywall.

      source

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Huh. So anyone could maintain a fork or patchset and distribute builds that were feature-for-feature identical to Immich but with no nag screens. Just an interesting thought.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • P13@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Sorry, that’s what I grew up calling paid software that was free to use in practice. That effectively how Immich is presented now. There is a button to buy a license which changes to an (optional) supporter badge once purchased.

      For the record, I am very happy with the software and paid for a license. I can see why people are bothered with Futo’s language but I personally can’t complain with how they’ve handled the project itself.

      source

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I love FUTO’s “license” policy. Basically, the license only shows you’ve paid, and in many cases, you can click the botton without paying and get the same badge. They’re basically encouraging donations through guilt.

        People should donate to projects they use, and I think FUTO’s nudge is a good idea that more projects should adopt.

        source